|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on Xen VM than standard
Mats,
I mounted the loopback file in dom0, chrooted to the mountpoint and redid the experiment. The
results is attached below. The time of open and stat64 calls is similar to the XenLinux case and
also much smaller than the standard Linux case. So, either using loopback file as backend of
XenLinux or directly mounting it in local filesystem will result in some benefit (maybe just caused
by the extra layer of block caching) for the performance of some system calls.
# strace -c /bin/sh -c /bin/echo foo
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
21.93 0.000490 490 1 write
16.34 0.000365 24 15 old_mmap
15.26 0.000341 38 9 3 open
9.62 0.000215 43 5 read
7.97 0.000178 10 18 brk
7.79 0.000174 87 2 munmap
4.07 0.000091 8 11 rt_sigaction
3.27 0.000073 12 6 close
2.91 0.000065 11 6 fstat64
2.28 0.000051 9 6 rt_sigprocmask
2.15 0.000048 24 2 access
1.75 0.000039 13 3 uname
1.66 0.000037 19 2 stat64
0.40 0.000009 9 1 getpgrp
0.40 0.000009 9 1 getuid32
0.36 0.000008 8 1 time
0.36 0.000008 8 1 getppid
0.36 0.000008 8 1 getgid32
0.31 0.000007 7 1 getpid
0.27 0.000006 6 1 execve
0.27 0.000006 6 1 geteuid32
0.27 0.000006 6 1 getegid32
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
100.00 0.002234 95 3 total
Thanks.
Xuehai
Petersson, Mats wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Anthony Liguori
Sent: 28 November 2005 14:39
To: xuehai zhang
Cc: Xen Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] open/stat64 syscalls run faster on
Xen VM than standard Linux
This may just be the difference between having the extra
level of block caching from using a loop back device.
Try running the same benchmark on a domain that uses an
actual partition. While the syscalls may appear to be
faster, I imagine it's because the cost of pulling in a block
has already been payed so the overall workload is unaffected.
And this would be the same as running standard linux with the loopback
file-system mounted and chroot to the local file-system, or would that
be different? [I'm asking because I don't actually understand enough
about how it works to know what difference it makes, and I would like to
know, because at some point I'll probably need to know this.]
--
Mats
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
xuehai zhang wrote:
[snip]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|