xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!
On 13 Nov 2005, at 18:28, Harry Butterworth wrote:
Is this the right approach? Is the check in dma_map_single overzealous?
When running on Xen, just because Linux has allocated adjacent pages
from its 'physical' memory map, doesn't mean they really are physically
contiguous. For I/O we have to go to extra effort to really allocate
truly contiguous multi-page extents.
So your code is correct. If you can preallocate buffers then you could
do that with dma_alloc_coherent and that would guarantee contigous
buffers....
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] USB virt status, harry
- RE: [Xen-devel] USB virt status, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Harry Butterworth
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Harry Butterworth
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt status --- Help please!!!, Keir Fraser
|
|
|