WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface
From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:34:43 -0700
Cc: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrei Petrov <andrei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:32:19 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GARklOJJ0mv2ZRrQCt6FrW1oSVh7iQltxFzRIiH4QenfCmI+aa0sIjLXs85V6MTACwX7DcqAiLhEQax7LJCYuIKbHdKz/lW9RhviaizySmp+oTpReXfLskSuXClCVuXxGGI7nL0JC2bw7gLc0xTb10tTd5o6JJvXMlvfHtL3OZQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1d841fb2a6ceca0ca88d15d0047ff24f@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200509291317.25090.hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx> <200509291512.29891.hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx> <31c4b41b23a195dd2d69cdea28754843@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050930005405.GG5242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bac2506160e28cc7fecb9afa4fddfb10@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <24aa8891a52e3d3a34fc3b59179a8d0f@xxxxxxxxxx> <99da46303de5c070b985b66e5c1c96dd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4f11a9f98b8a256a1a9011af12e9788e@xxxxxxxxxx> <1d841fb2a6ceca0ca88d15d0047ff24f@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You also said you would never support PAE. PAE is second-only to SMP support on the list of customer requirements. There may be a compelling reason not to, but superficially running many 32-bit paravirtualized guests on a 64-bit HV makes a great deal of sense.


-Kip



There's the rub: we don't expect to ever want to provide 32-bit x86 ABI
compatibility on 64-bit x86 Xen. We will not be supporting 32-bit
paravirtualised guests on 64-bit x86 Xen, and we've taken the approach
of requiring separate 32- and 64-bit toolsets (which isn't too painful
on x86 since full-fledged 64-bit filesystems are quite easy to come
by).

Really this sounds to me like this is only going to be a problem for
ppc. That given, knocking up a translation script to import the
interfaces into your 32-bit toolchain does seem worthy of
consideration. It wouldn't allow you to use the same tool binaries on
both 32- and 64-bit ppc Xen, but I don't know how much you actually
care about that...



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>