 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] domain in state p isn't destroyed
| To: | xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] domain in state p isn't destroyed |
| From: | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:32:28 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:30:02 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eaYk4siG36pXS/bA7f5cRYgaxWpe75QiWEk18hDSYVusMprEYwUvgiv4dQMcXsmDU9JWYahxkekfFQcg1TMu+mEoknam5PQV7a+zvjR0lqRIo4CiLIRQlM2jI+oI0/bi7YNynR0DzWg/+tXlCHji8HsI85NE47XAKOleFoKatrU= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Reply-to: | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Using recent xen-unstable. I execute 'poweroff' in domU. xm list in dom0 then shows: Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 91 - 2 r----- 1123.6 server 2 96 1 1 --p--- 0.0 I can execute 'xm destroy server' manually now, but I thought it was supposed to be automatic? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] IOMMU support: __direct_remap_pfn_range() fails, Langsdorf, Mark |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] ethool for e1000, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] IOMMU support: __direct_remap_pfn_range() fails, Langsdorf, Mark |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: domain in state p isn't destroyed, Chris Bainbridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
