[Xen-devel] USB backend and XenBus

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-devel] USB backend and XenBus
From:	Mark Ryden <markryde@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:50:58 +0200
Delivery-date:	Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:48:45 +0000
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rQoCH6YjmfcteTZIv6J0dZ0UnBTtWybZGHXvq6s3pkRDwyEfMUlLKLFCI3cUXXnaS2bTnwRuL3lpjz8LvnBPW6134Pp6hhrU9059HSX8GB9Dqfp96iadyc8rYuyRnYeP8skFzwFVmimHIz3Wgp3tSVgkfOzlYbDmB23bfghjQWc=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to:	markryde@xxxxxxxxx
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello,

   I wonder why USB backend does not use XenBus. (in xen unstable).
   
   Network  backend and Block backend do use XenBus. 

   And USB backend seems to have much in common with them. (Rings,
event channels,etc).

   Is it a task to be done in the future, or is there some
architectural or other

  reason that  XenBus will not be used by USB backend  at all ? 

  Can someone elaborate on it in 2-3 sentences (or more, if he likes) ? 

   TIA,
       MR

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] USB backend and XenBus