WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Patch - loader for plan9's a.out format.

To: david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Patch - loader for plan9's a.out format.
From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:50:56 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:49:53 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Mgur4/s2HL3e8HKECPCmWvl9966i30UWGUkiSkQykiQojV5muwV3TSSnm/tNG+voR40S6kmPbD+BQPu/op329miVMRFXlzshyjd7Qm2LWkTCv57B56UUes7osUpd2L/oEMIH1tv24BdHw0V7ibXPOvu6TruNykcEW+9JiIZCCKI=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42BE0055.5060708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.61.0506231520160.5014@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42BDE1E5.7000204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b1fa2917050625162463f36edf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42BE0055.5060708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I guess I haven't been paying attention. In that case it really is generic.

  -Kip

On 6/25/05, David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kip Macy wrote:
> > Considering that NetBSD and FreeBSD have used it for some time, yes.
> > 'generic_elf_build' would probably be a slightly better name.
> 
> IIUC, it supports ELF, raw binaries, and now plan9 a.out.
> 
> --
> David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel