 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree)
| To: | Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree) |
| From: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:53:31 +0900 |
| Cc: | Xen Dev <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 31 May 2005 15:52:47 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ST90xeIjJmKRnU4NmQZWMjA4nPPROWOW1u9p8en8xT9PSJIJ20EmqHNTFkds0EyAdf6ABJZz8kbGqZ0rQ/uSuJH9wQ0nN0Ouv8760xnOtsmfhFsBnQWnu59LrNV9mM5bnIsKLHgJZgNC1su3QtbYcBowWZ5aj/NBE3ul972HCzA= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <9cde8bff050530182342a79827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3d8eece205053106414831da72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 5/31/05, Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/31/05, aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch (against -unstable ChangeSet@xxxxxx) does the followings: > > > > - put some configurable variables to xend_config.sxp, and set them to > > default values. That will make people aware of their existence, and > > let them easily reconfigure xend when needed. > > I've not applied this part because we're not sure we're going to keep > some of these. i see the point, but how about part of this patch in -testing tree (see http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-05/msg01204.html). i believe that those options are stable, so if you apply -testing patch (this -testing patch got no comment), we should keep the same options in this patch, and not reject them all. regards, aq _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Latest bk can NOT compile on x86_64, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree), Christian Limpach |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend-config.sxp (-unstable tree), Christian Limpach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
