|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?
On 23 May 2005, at 20:59, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
Should ac_timer be removed and replaced by a lighter weight
mechanism, or at least its use deprecated?
What's heavyweight about it? We can maybe slim down the interface a
little, but we need a mechanism for managing at least an alarm timeout
per vcpu. I don't imagine anyhting much simpler than ac_timer would
really fit the bill.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- Re: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-devel] ac_timer: time to say goodbye?, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
|
|
|
|
|