xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or l
On Sat, 21 May 2005, aq wrote:
> yes, but that is not a (scientific) paper, which would let us
> understand more about this technology.
agree, but it told me enough to know I can't just boot Plan 9 under it :-)
ron
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] RE: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, Joshua LeVasseur
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, aq
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen, aq
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Pre-virtualization, was Re: linux/arch/xen/i386 or linux/arch/i386/xen,
Ronald G. Minnich <=
|
|
|