WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS:s

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS:something about ia64 that nobody would read :-)
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:53:06 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:52:38 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVWYhOb6iQzwhbMQRu/rv1j8qXTbgACSROw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS:something about ia64 that nobody would read :-)
 
 
> > I'd vote for expunging CONFIG_SMP.
> 
> I've heard its not uncommon when debugging nasty problems on 
> Linux to turn off SMP as it simplifies the world considerably.

Seting maxcpus=1 has basically the same dynamic effect. The only point
of having the build option is to reduce the number of LOCK'ed
operations.

Ian
 
> I'm not sure this same argument applies to Xen, but there's 
> enough kernel hackers on this list that I thought it would be 
> interesting to open this up for discussion.
> 
> Granted, turning off SMP on Xen/x86 doesn't even compile 
> right now, but that should be fixable.
> 
> So... opinions anyone?  Is keeping CONFIG_SMP (potentially) 
> useful or not?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS:something about ia64 that nobody would read :-), Ian Pratt <=