|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS:s
> > I'd vote for expunging CONFIG_SMP.
>
> I've heard its not uncommon when debugging nasty problems on
> Linux to turn off SMP as it simplifies the world considerably.
Seting maxcpus=1 has basically the same dynamic effect. The only point
of having the build option is to reduce the number of LOCK'ed
operations.
Ian
> I'm not sure this same argument applies to Xen, but there's
> enough kernel hackers on this list that I thought it would be
> interesting to open this up for discussion.
>
> Granted, turning off SMP on Xen/x86 doesn't even compile
> right now, but that should be fixable.
>
> So... opinions anyone? Is keeping CONFIG_SMP (potentially)
> useful or not?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-devel] CONFIG_SMP or !CONFIG_SMP... that is the question. WAS:something about ia64 that nobody would read :-),
Ian Pratt <=
|
|
|
|
|