WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Clustered xAPIC and Unisys ES7000 patch

To: <natasha@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Clustered xAPIC and Unisys ES7000 patch
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:08:40 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:08:35 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcVB9R79lccRZwXxR5ukCQtvsd+WmAAAQJsw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Clustered xAPIC and Unisys ES7000 patch
> I sent a second patch to the list last wednesday 
> night/thursday morning April 6.  I can resend if you need me to.

Ah, got it, thanks. 

The patch looks good to me. I propose to apply it, but Keir should have
the final say.

Aravindh: make sense to you? Going with 2.6 based code seems better in
the longer run.

Ian
 
> Some of this work conflicts with my patch (but not a 
> significant amount).  These patches are based on linux 2.4.  
> Unfortunately, the code organization changed drastically for 
> linux 2.6 and it will be a bit of work to get the Xen code up 
> to date.  However, I do believe that modeling Xen after 2.6 
> will give a much cleaner implentation -- the code for the 
> various machines which use clustered apics can go into 
> separate files instead of having so many ifdef's in the files.
> 
> I would like to propose updating all the Xen apic code.  I 
> think the first step is just to model new code, such as the 
> ES7000 support code, after 2.6 as far as code organization 
> goes.  Then the extra code from 2.4 can be stripped out.  I 
> was going to send some patches to start stripping out code 
> but wasn't sure if the Unisys team was using it or not.  
> Clearly they are so that will have to wait.
> I also wrote a set of patches for Summit clustered APIC 
> support (which are currently untested) so I'm aware of some 
> of the changes which need to be made to the code for 
> re-organization.  I'd like to submit some patches for that 
> but they will conflict with these ES7000 patches.  So I guess 
> we just need to make a decision what the best way forward 
> is/how much re-org we want to do right now.
> 
> Natasha Jarymowycz
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:01:55 +0100, Ian Pratt 
> <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > Natasha,
> >
> > Are the generic apic bits of this already handled by your 
> patch? Have 
> > you a 2nd version of it ready?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel