|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:33:12AM -0500, Philip R Auld wrote:
> This effects merging though, right? I don't think the the front
> end has done any merging.
The noop elevator does front and back merging.
My understanding is that it's used in the frontend driver.
Otherwise, unplugging on every block would indeed be quite bad ...
Regards,
--
Kurt Garloff, Director SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
pgpIQTF59eKBs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., (continued)
- RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance., peter bier
- Re: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.,
Kurt Garloff <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Nivedita Singhvi
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Kurt Garloff
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Nivedita Singhvi
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Andrew Theurer
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
|
|
|
|
|