On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Name: disable-html-docs.patch
> > Depends: add-build.patch
> > Description: disable html docs, as they use non-free tools.
> > Building the html docs requires latex2html, which is non-free. Disabling
> > them allows for xen to be uploaded to main.
> > .
> > This is not a big deal, as ps and pdf forms of the documentation are
> > still included.
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Heath <doogie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > --- xen-2.0.5.orig/docs/Makefile
> > +++ xen-2.0.5/docs/Makefile
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> > GFX = $(patsubst %.fig, %.eps, $(wildcard figs/*.fig))
> > all: build
> > -build: ps pdf html
> > +build: ps pdf
> > rm -f *.aux *.dvi *.bbl *.blg *.glo *.idx *.ilg *.log *.ind *.toc
> > ps: $(DOC_PS)
> > @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
> > $(INSTALL_DIR) $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
> > cp -dR ps $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
> > cp -dR pdf $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
> > - cp -dR html $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdocdir)
> > pdf/%.pdf: ps/%.ps
> > $(INSTALL_DIR) $(@D)
> I see that a variant of this has been applied to 2.0-testing. Unforunately,
> just doing "which latext2html" won't suffice, as the package may actually be
> installed, but we can't call it.
> I can Build-Conflict with it, which will solve the problem, but then those
> people who do like using latex2html will dislike me.
> I've been thinking of writing a configure script, and this may be the kindling
> that starts the fire.
ps: I'm working on producing 2.0-testing debs. They contain a patch we
need(changing a device in dom0(ie, lvm) propagating to a 2.6 guest)
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
Xen-devel mailing list