| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: ports
Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, maru wrote:
(and seriously, who uses Plan 9? yeah, It's got some very cool
features, but was it worth porting?)
This type of question, appearing on a research list, still amazes me.
Yes, the port was worth the effort.
ron
This is what happens when you don't separate xen-users from
xen-developers.
Having said that, when I was compiling the index of virtualization
papers, I could not find papers on the nuances of Xen porting.
Perhaps this is not a common research topic in virtualization because
other para-virtualization efforts have not attracted as many ports as
Xen. An index of Xen porting resources could help future ports. In the
absence of papers, are there known mailing list threads or other notes
that could be compiled into an index? E.g. a comparison of the Plan 9
and NetBSD ports.
Rich
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home