RE: [Xen-devel] gcc4: char * vs unsigned char *

On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:

>  > Since xen uses -Wall -Werror, gcc4 refuses to compile areas
> > of the code where "char *" and "unsigned char *" are used in a
> > mixed fashion.

> I'm a big fan of -Werror.
> 
> It sounds like we should change the generic string implementation. 

OK, I'll start patch spamming the list ;)

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] frontend and backend, Mark Williamson
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] RE: Xen/ia64, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
Previous by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] gcc4: char * vs unsigned char , Ian Pratt*
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] Xen 2.0.3 - bridge faliure??, Tom Hibbert
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]