WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] reiserfs/xfs creation/check problem

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] reiserfs/xfs creation/check problem
From: Vitez Gabor <vitezg@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:29:47 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:00:15 +0000
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041117135852.GD6008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20041115133121.GB16528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041117135852.GD6008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Hi,

> > kandur2:~# mkfs.xfs /dev/hda2
> [...]
> > ioctl 00001261 not supported by XL blkif
> 
> how old is your mkfs here?  there were issues a long time ago with the
> ioctls to get the device size (64-bit size request not being supported
> or being quirky and needing work...  i forget the details now)

This is xfsprogs 2.6.20-1 from debian/sarge. SGI has 2.6.25 I will try that,
and report back.

> > bread: Cannot read the block (51199): (Input/output error).
> 
> write over those blocks and hope the drive remaps the bad sectors
> safely and it doesn't get worse
> 
> this usually works but not always

This is definetly not a badblock problem, consider this setup:

/dev/rootvg/dom2xfslv in domain0 gets exported to the domain "dom2" as hda2.

creating and checking xfs/reiserfs filesystems in domain0 on
/dev/rootvg/dom2xfslv works fine

creating and checking xfs/reiserfs filesystems in dom2 on
/dev/hda2 fails.

The disk blocks under domain0:/dev/rootvg/dom2xfslv and dom2:/dev/hda2 are
the same. mkfs/fsck versions are the same in both domains.


        Gabor


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel