WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Domain0 won't boot on latest unstable bits?

To: "MAGENHEIMER,DAN (HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Domain0 won't boot on latest unstable bits?
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:21:34 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:24:29 +0000
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 Mar 2004 18:05:42 EST." <BAD2BC26CB905B469D66053BB354F8390362DA54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I just bk-clone'd the latest unstable, rebuilt everything
> (including using the new 'make ARCH=xeno' syntax*** for
> building xenolinux) and on boot, I got:
> 
> DOM0: Unable to obtain IOPL, despite being SIF_PRIVILEGED
> 
> Just to make sure, I repeated everything and still got
> the same result.  (I know... that's the definition of
> insanity ;-)

Definitely sounds like Xenolinux and Xen are out of sync. XL is
probably sending the wrong control-interface version number to Xen. 
Are you sure you are building both, that XL is taking teh correct
hypervisor-ifs header files; and that you are booting the two most
recent built images?

> *** By the way, the new syntax is inconsistent with
>     2.6 linux builds so this new requirement may
>     generate a lot of confusion.  Xen uses
> 
>       make ARCH=xxx
> 
>     and Linux 2.6 uses
> 
>       ARCH=xxx make
> 
>     and they are definitely different.  I'm no make
>     expert and this may be unrelated but doing
> 
>       make ARCH=xeno oldconfig dep bzImage
> 
>     doesn't work for me unless I do the steps
>     with separate make's.

Okay, I've checked in a fix for this to 1.2 and to unstable.
The syntax 'ARCH=xeno make xxxx' will work again now.
You should find that 'ARCH=xeno make mrproper oldconfig dep bzImage'
does the right thing...

 -- Keir


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>