|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-cim
Re: [Xen-cim] Memory pool question 
| 
Reposting since it appears my original post didn't make it to the list ...
Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:
 
Jim,
 It's not clear to me which memory object we should be using 
to 'populate' a memory pool.  The System Memory Profile 
states that 1 instance of CIM_Memory is used to describe the 
logical aspects of system memory and * instances of 
CIM_PhysicalMemory are used to describe physical aspects of 
system memory.  The two are connected via CIM_Realizes association.
Which of these should we use to represent the host side of 
memory resources assigned to the pool?  Perhaps more clearly 
stated as which object should we use on the 'PartComponent' 
property of association Xen_MemoryPoolComponent 
(CIM_ConcreteComponent)?
    
 
Xen does not allow us to look at the details of the physical memory and
so, I have started working on the assumption that it's going to be
CIM_Memory.
Raj
 
Are you working on Xen_Memory, Xen_MemoryPool and all of the related 
associations? I'm about done with it :-/. Pretty much a repeat of the 
Processor stuff I finished a while back. In fact, many of the 
associations have common code that needs to be abstracted out. It would 
have significant impact on lines of code :-). 
In addition I have another version of the memory stuff (and all other 
providers that touch Xen) for the new C bindings. 
Jim
_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |