|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-cim
[Xen-cim] Re: CIM_ResourcePool keys 
| The current CR in the SVPC workgroup has InstanceID as the key.
http://www.dmtf.org/apps/org/workgroup/redundancy/download.php/19632/SVPCCR00032.001.html
It looks like the files in the MOF folder may be a bit out of date.
We've been focusing on the CR since that's what we'll have to push
through the DMTF process.  Perhaps we should raise the topic on the
SVPC-V call to ask if we should deprecate the MOF folder so we don't
create more confusion and/or busywork to keep things in sync.
Daniel
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:26:57PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Currently there are no keys defined in CIM_ResourcePool.mof.  Will this 
> class be abstract with subclasses defining keys or will the Name 
> property be overridden to be a key - as described 
> CIM_ManagedSystemElement (parent class defining Name property)?  For now 
> think I'll override Name and make it a key in the various subclasses of 
> CIM_ResourcePool, e.g. Xen_ProcessorPool, etc.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jim
-- 
Daniel Hiltgen (dhiltgen@xxxxxxxxxx)  650-384-4156
Virtual Infrastructure Management CIM SDK
_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |