WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-changelog

[Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] x86-64: adjust emulation of control trans

To: xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] x86-64: adjust emulation of control transfers
From: Xen patchbot-unstable <patchbot-unstable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:40:19 -0700
Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:41:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-changelog-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: BK change log <xen-changelog.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-changelog@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-changelog>, <mailto:xen-changelog-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-changelog>, <mailto:xen-changelog-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-changelog-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# HG changeset patch
# User Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
# Date 1250683324 -3600
# Node ID 429ef4f4fe37f1f739ebfa72f343e224ca524054
# Parent  456b4ec002443227f6d97f79b213dc4b2d281f9e
x86-64: adjust emulation of control transfers

While Intel and AMD implementations differ in various respects when
it comes to non-default operand sizes of control transfer instructions
and segment register loads (lfs, lgs, lss), it seems to make senss to
(a) match their behavior if they agree and (b) prefer the more
permissive behavior if they don't agree:

- honor operand size overrides on near brances (AMD does, Intel
  doesn't)
- honor operand size overrides on far branches (both Intel and AMD do)
- honor REX.W on far branches (Intel does, AMD doesn't except on far
  returns)
- honor REX.W on lfs, lgs, and lss (Intel does, AMD doesn't)

Also, do not permit emulation of pushing/popping segment registers
other than fs and gs as well as that of les and lds (the latter are
particularly important due to the re-use of the respective opcodes as
VEX prefixes in AVX).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c |   25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff -r 456b4ec00244 -r 429ef4f4fe37 xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c    Wed Aug 19 13:01:41 2009 +0100
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c    Wed Aug 19 13:02:04 2009 +0100
@@ -572,9 +572,10 @@ do {                                    
 do {                                                                    \
     int _rel = (int)(rel);                                              \
     _regs.eip += _rel;                                                  \
-    if ( !mode_64bit() )                                                \
-        _regs.eip = ((op_bytes == 2)                                    \
-                     ? (uint16_t)_regs.eip : (uint32_t)_regs.eip);      \
+    if ( op_bytes == 2 )                                                \
+        _regs.eip = (uint16_t)_regs.eip;                                \
+    else if ( !mode_64bit() )                                           \
+        _regs.eip = (uint32_t)_regs.eip;                                \
 } while (0)
 
 struct fpu_insn_ctxt {
@@ -1648,6 +1649,7 @@ x86_emulate(
         struct segment_register reg;
         src.val = x86_seg_es;
     push_seg:
+        generate_exception_if(mode_64bit() && !twobyte, EXC_UD, -1);
         fail_if(ops->read_segment == NULL);
         if ( (rc = ops->read_segment(src.val, &reg, ctxt)) != 0 )
             return rc;
@@ -1663,6 +1665,7 @@ x86_emulate(
     case 0x07: /* pop %%es */
         src.val = x86_seg_es;
     pop_seg:
+        generate_exception_if(mode_64bit() && !twobyte, EXC_UD, -1);
         fail_if(ops->write_segment == NULL);
         /* 64-bit mode: POP defaults to a 64-bit operand. */
         if ( mode_64bit() && (op_bytes == 4) )
@@ -2108,8 +2111,8 @@ x86_emulate(
         uint16_t sel;
         uint32_t eip;
 
+        generate_exception_if(mode_64bit(), EXC_UD, -1);
         fail_if(ops->read_segment == NULL);
-        generate_exception_if(mode_64bit(), EXC_UD, -1);
 
         eip = insn_fetch_bytes(op_bytes);
         sel = insn_fetch_type(uint16_t);
@@ -2327,7 +2330,7 @@ x86_emulate(
     case 0xc2: /* ret imm16 (near) */
     case 0xc3: /* ret (near) */ {
         int offset = (b == 0xc2) ? insn_fetch_type(uint16_t) : 0;
-        op_bytes = mode_64bit() ? 8 : op_bytes;
+        op_bytes = ((op_bytes == 4) && mode_64bit()) ? 8 : op_bytes;
         if ( (rc = read_ulong(x86_seg_ss, sp_post_inc(op_bytes + offset),
                               &dst.val, op_bytes, ctxt, ops)) != 0 )
             goto done;
@@ -2339,6 +2342,7 @@ x86_emulate(
         unsigned long sel;
         dst.val = x86_seg_es;
     les: /* dst.val identifies the segment */
+        generate_exception_if(mode_64bit() && !twobyte, EXC_UD, -1);
         generate_exception_if(src.type != OP_MEM, EXC_UD, -1);
         if ( (rc = read_ulong(src.mem.seg, src.mem.off + src.bytes,
                               &sel, 2, ctxt, ops)) != 0 )
@@ -2413,7 +2417,6 @@ x86_emulate(
     case 0xca: /* ret imm16 (far) */
     case 0xcb: /* ret (far) */ {
         int offset = (b == 0xca) ? insn_fetch_type(uint16_t) : 0;
-        op_bytes = mode_64bit() ? 8 : op_bytes;
         if ( (rc = read_ulong(x86_seg_ss, sp_post_inc(op_bytes),
                               &dst.val, op_bytes, ctxt, ops)) ||
              (rc = read_ulong(x86_seg_ss, sp_post_inc(op_bytes + offset),
@@ -3066,17 +3069,17 @@ x86_emulate(
     }
 
     case 0xe8: /* call (near) */ {
-        int rel = (((op_bytes == 2) && !mode_64bit())
+        int rel = ((op_bytes == 2)
                    ? (int32_t)insn_fetch_type(int16_t)
                    : insn_fetch_type(int32_t));
-        op_bytes = mode_64bit() ? 8 : op_bytes;
+        op_bytes = ((op_bytes == 4) && mode_64bit()) ? 8 : op_bytes;
         src.val = _regs.eip;
         jmp_rel(rel);
         goto push;
     }
 
     case 0xe9: /* jmp (near) */ {
-        int rel = (((op_bytes == 2) && !mode_64bit())
+        int rel = ((op_bytes == 2)
                    ? (int32_t)insn_fetch_type(int16_t)
                    : insn_fetch_type(int32_t));
         jmp_rel(rel);
@@ -3364,7 +3367,7 @@ x86_emulate(
             break;
         case 2: /* call (near) */
         case 4: /* jmp (near) */
-            if ( (dst.bytes != 8) && mode_64bit() )
+            if ( (dst.bytes == 4) && mode_64bit() )
             {
                 dst.bytes = op_bytes = 8;
                 if ( dst.type == OP_REG )
@@ -3900,7 +3903,7 @@ x86_emulate(
     }
 
     case 0x80 ... 0x8f: /* jcc (near) */ {
-        int rel = (((op_bytes == 2) && !mode_64bit())
+        int rel = ((op_bytes == 2)
                    ? (int32_t)insn_fetch_type(int16_t)
                    : insn_fetch_type(int32_t));
         if ( test_cc(b, _regs.eflags) )

_______________________________________________
Xen-changelog mailing list
Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] x86-64: adjust emulation of control transfers, Xen patchbot-unstable <=