Re: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter

To:	Tomoiaga Cristian <cristi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter
From:	Lars Seeliger <meesterlars@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:32:34 +0100
Cc:	Jonathan Ludlam <Jonathan.Ludlam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:33:04 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jCEgHZ5VGzqmn/rCz0Cc+t9doQVCdS3VOCQnKTed1NU=; b=d3IjwpTnIJcuB+RWvx5XE9edg19ZGJD48JKa059rDtn15v7ilEwhl90M/yNOb9EyvU Nli4sOpKZ0PKWtDOv3rABhsmMnsc99HUqfsSUVftNNPFyVuEpQrMSfZDt5gSwluYY2Yt MpFKAP1ik/tlCm3U2w9x3HUrmLIaC+zo4EjF8=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=piJ0z/tiexanxmZBbRgFh62QyGuUK3MD2+ml/TKSMdmahN4kPaIGWR+r0nDN+6zGqN DE6XciXfqbpGsFRfMlUdK3768Fhw+D3flcnqHIVO2Q9M6OWwGR18OGEHmCijaKYYcpLp MraaUGWBZHNg82ey/PYnPYLFUN/VWmxnNPLYY=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA342C@baseex>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-api@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<1297786344874-3386189.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim22fKneCcOyZdoPBbaSm=-8LDSdQ5kZsiW=E-s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA33EE@baseex> <AANLkTin7u+m0nuXr4R_Dj2kKVqvT=quP6aKFYYoG4R0o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikPYkcsGDj1s8_Mb5Y1O0=vPqGDUDWCSOvannEJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimR19qvCAsK2AP6=xNGPDV-sgWa-P-C16qQTE41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA33F5@baseex> <AANLkTi=p2WCDS-ieknQB-sLSyTqNLvDGTodg3xyBt1H4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <34F09EA2-FE48-4DC7-950A-DDE2CA70A840@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTina6=05P10X=tKYzR=t1Vj_M_Tqx1pwMq8tztBG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA342B@baseex> <AANLkTik8mWakY317KGytkRwQ9b00TJw=zkPtSsA2Q=2u@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA342C@baseex>
Sender:	xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

XS 5.6 FP1 features QoS for virtual disks. Could this be what you're looking for? Surely this is also available in XCP.

http://docs.vmd.citrix.com/XenServer/5.6.0fp1/1.0/en_gb/reference.html#disk_qos

On 16 February 2011 19:40, Tomoiaga Cristian <cristi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well, the XenCenter issue is partially solved now anyway.
A way bigger issue is being able to throttle iops/vdi. Seems nobody wants to answer if it’s possible (I am sure it is) and if there are any plans to implement something.
VMWare already has this and I am amazed why this is treated as not being important since almost everyone has problems when one VM creates too many/sepcific IOPS.

Regards,
Tomoiaga

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-api

Re: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter