xen-api
Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings
On 10/11/10 12:50, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
yes, the partial application would not have triggered either when it's
linked to a name, however you do remove potential audit site (warning
lines), since "unused variable" warnings has been silenced.
I think this is a good point, and one that I agree with.
Silencing the warnings (by replacing unused identifiers
with "_") means that we'll no longer be able to use the
compiler as a tool for discovery of these sites.
Cheers,
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Rok Strnisa
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Vincent Hanquez
- RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Rok Strnisa
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Jonathan Knowles
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Rok Strnisa
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Jonathan Knowles
- RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Dave Scott
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Jonathan Knowles
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Jonathan Knowles
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings,
Jonathan Knowles <=
- RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] imported patch removing-warnings, Rok Strnisa
|
|
|