|
xen-api
Re: [Xen-API] How snapshot work on LVMoISCS SR
The GC code is included in the distro. It is the
/opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py module. Kick off a manual SR scan (xe
sr-scan uuid=<SR UUID>) and then check in the log file (/var/log/SMlog)
to see what is happenning. You'll see some lines such as:
[23271] 2010-01-27 10:59:13.769991 LVHDSR.scan for
2cfaea72-8772-1c00-6e47-879140fa1db2
............
[23271] 2010-01-27 10:59:13.824614 Kicking GC
<23271> 2010-01-27 10:59:13.824690 === SR
2cfaea72-8772-1c00-6e47-879140fa1db2: gc ===
...........
<23826> 2010-01-27 11:01:02.741333 -- SR 2cfa ('Local storage') has 3 VDIs
(1 VHD trees) --
<23826> 2010-01-27 11:01:02.741496 *3dd5c107[VHD](1.00G//8.00M|n)
<23826> 2010-01-27 11:01:02.741574 d3a89874[VHD](1.00G//8.00M|n)
<23826> 2010-01-27 11:01:02.741651 2f6a87b8[VHD](1.00G//1.01G|n)
and then the GC should proceed depending on whether there are
coalescable nodes.
- Julian
Anthony Xu wrote:
Hi Julian,
Thanks for your detailed explanation,
I'd like to have GC, I'm using XenServer 5.5, seems there is no GC
running background, I just checked there are still 16 vhd chain after
one night, Where can I get GC for XenServer 5.5?
Anthony
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 02:34 -0800, Julian Chesterfield wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Anthony Xu wrote:
Hi all,
Basically snapshot on LVMoISCSI SR work well, it provides thin
provisioning, so it is fast and disk space efficient.
But I still have below concern.
There is one more vhd chain when creating snapshot, if I creates 16
snapshots, there are 16 vhd chains, that means when one VM accesses a
disk block, it may need to access 16 vhd lvm one by one, then get the
right block, it makes VM access disk slow. However, it is
understandable, it is part of snapshot IMO.
The depth and speed of access will depend on the write pattern to the
disk. In XCP we add an optimisation called a BATmap which stores one bit
per BAT entry. This is a fast lookup table that is cached in memory
while the VHD is open, and tells the block device handler whether a
block has been fully allocated. Once the block is fully allocated (all
logical 2MB written) the block handler knows that it doesn't need to
read or write the Bitmap that corresponds to the data block, it can go
directly to the disk offset. Scanning through the VHD chain can
therefore be very quick, i.e. the block handler reads down the chain of
BAT tables for each node until it detects a node that is allocated with
hopefully the BATmap value set. The worst case is a random disk write
workload which causes the disk to be fragmented and partially allocated.
Every read or write will therefore potentially incur a bitmap check at
every level of the chain.
But after I delete all these 16 snapshots, there is still 16 vhd chains,
the disk access is still slow, which is not understandable and
reasonable, even though there may be only several KB difference between
each snapshot,
There is a mechanism in XCP called the GC coalesce thread which gets
kicked asynchronously following a VDI deletion event. It queries the VHD
tree, and determines whether there is any coalescable work to do.
Coalesceable work is defined as:
'a hidden child node that has no siblings'
Hidden nodes are non-leaf nodes that reside within a chain. When the
snapshot leaf node is deleted therefore, it will leave redundant links
in the chain that can be safely coalesced. You can kick off a coalesce
by issuing an SR scan, although it should kick off automatically within
30 seconds of deleting the snapshot node, handled by XAPI. If you look
in the /var/log/SMlog file you'll see a lot of debug information
including tree dependencies which will tell you a) whether the GC thread
is running, and b) whether there is coalescable work to do. Note that
deleting snapshot nodes does not always mean that there is coalescable
work to do since there may be other siblings, e.g. VDI clones.
is there any way we can reduce depth of vhd chain after deleting
snapshots? get VM back to normal disk performance.
The coalesce thread handles this, see above.
And, I notice there are useless vhd volume exist after deleting snap
shots, can we delete them automatically?
No. I do not recommend deleting VHDs manually since they are almost
certainly referenced by something else in the chain. If you delete them
manually you will break the chain, it will become unreadable, and you
potentially lose critical data. VHD chains must be correctly coalesced
in order to maintain data integrity.
Thanks,
Julian
- Anthony
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
|
|
Home