Re: [Xen-API] Java XML RPC with Xen-API?

[Evan Bigall <evan.bigall@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My "execute" method returns result.get("Value"), you should then be able 
to cast that into a java Set, and iterate through all the key/value pairs.
I'm pretty sure this all works as expected.

Evan
Stefan Berger wrote:
> Evan Bigall <evan.bigall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 04/02/2007 12:42:01 PM:
>
> > I believe the object is a map, here is a code fragment that might help:
> >
> >             /*
> >              Unimplemented...
> >              Object kernelKernel=execute("VM.get_kernel_kernel", 
> params);
> >             */
> >
> >             java.util.Map result=(java.util.Map)execute("VM.
> > get_record", params);
> >
>
> For get_record I also get a map, where the 'Value' key itself contains 
> a java.util.Map as value type.
> Another function that returns a 'Set' is get_by_label_name, which also 
> returns an Object as value to the 'Value' key. Maybe it's the 
> functions that return 'Set's that cannot be deserialized or are not 
> properly serialized ?
>    Stefan
>
>
> >             /*
> >             Set keyset=result.keySet();
> >             for(Object key : keyset) {
> >                 LOG.debug("XXX key %s value %b \"%s\"\n",
> >                           (String)key, null==result.get((String)key),
> >                           result.get((String)key));
> >             }
> >             */
> >
> >             String kernelKernel=(String)result.get("PV_kernel");
> > /Evan
> >
> > Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> >   I am experimenting with a Java client to access xend through the
> > Xen-API. Using the Apache XML-RPC library (version 3) I could open a
> > session that returned the status value and the uuid of the session.
> > When I try to call VM.get_all() in a subsequent step, the returned
> > HashMap again contains the status code but as a second parameter a
> > quite useless Java 'Object' -- not a Vector or so. I see, though,
> > that Xend returns a list of UUIDs of the managed domains. Is there
> > any way to have the second parameter become something more useful
> > like a Vector or a String[] or does another client library do this 
> better?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >    Stefan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xen-api mailing list
> > xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
> >   
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api